Corporate Byte

Unlocking the Power of Provided That: A Guide to Effective Legal Writing

Provided that: Understanding its Meaning and Usage in WritingHave you ever come across the phrase “provided that” while reading a legal document or even in everyday conversation? This seemingly simple phrase holds great significance when it comes to setting conditions, exceptions, and qualifications.

In this article, we will delve into the meaning and definition of “provided that” and explore its various usages in legal writing. By the end, you will have a comprehensive understanding of this phrase and be able to use it effectively in your own writing.

Meaning and Definition of “Provided that”

Various meanings of “Provided that”

“Provided that” can be understood as a phrase that sets certain conditions or exceptions. It implies that something is true or will happen only if a specific condition is met.

Synonymous phrases include “on the condition that,” “with the exception that,” “if,” “only if,” and “as long as.” By using these words interchangeably, one can convey the same meaning while adding variety to their writing.

Definition and usage in legal writing

In legal writing, “provided that” helps to establish conditions, limitations, exceptions, or qualifications within a contract or a statute. It acts as a qualifier that specifies certain requirements that must be met for a particular clause or provision to apply.

Legal documents often employ this phrase to ensure clarity and precision, leaving no room for misinterpretation. How to Use “Provided that”

Usage as verb + conjunction

One way to use “provided that” is as a verb + conjunction combination.

For example, “The landlord will rent the property to the tenant, provided that the tenant pays the deposit in full.” Here, the phrase acts as a connector that links the action of renting the property with the condition of deposit payment. This usage is particularly effective in formal writing, as it clearly indicates the terms under which something will happen.

Usage for imposing conditions, referring to future events, exceptions, and qualifications

“Provided that” is a versatile phrase that can be used to impose conditions, refer to future events, highlight exceptions, and qualify statements. Let’s explore each of these usages in detail:

– Imposing Conditions: “The scholarship will be granted, provided that the applicant meets the academic requirements.” In this example, the phrase establishes the condition of meeting academic requirements for the scholarship to be granted.

– Referring to Future Events: “The contract will be extended, provided that the client renews it before the expiry date.” Here, the phrase indicates that the contract extension depends on the client renewing it before the specified date. – Highlighting Exceptions: “The company will refund the purchase amount, provided that the product is returned within 30 days, except for items on sale.” The phrase sets the conditions for a refund, while also making an exception for sale items.

– Qualifying Statements: “The software is free to use, provided that it is not for commercial purposes.” This usage sets a limitation on the free usage of the software, qualifying it only for non-commercial purposes. By utilizing “provided that” in these various ways, writers can communicate their intentions clearly and minimize any potential misunderstandings.

Conclusion:

With a firm grasp on the meaning and usage of “provided that,” you can now confidently navigate legal documents and employ this phrase in your own writing. Remember, “provided that” establishes conditions, exceptions, and qualifications, all while maintaining precision and clarity.

Whether you are drafting contracts, writing formal letters, or engaging in legal discourse, a nuanced understanding of this phrase will undoubtedly enhance your communication skills and ensure effective conveyance of your intended message. Comparison between “Provided that” and “Providing that”

Interchangeable use and preference for “Provided that”

While “provided that” and “providing that” may sound similar and have a similar meaning, they are not completely interchangeable.

However, the use of “provided that” is more widespread and preferred in formal writing, including legal documents. Critics argue that “providing that” is less precise and can introduce ambiguity in certain contexts.

As a result, “provided that” is the common way to convey conditions, exceptions, and qualifications. For example, consider the sentence, “The project will proceed, provided that the necessary funds are allocated.” Here, “provided that” clearly establishes the condition of allocating the necessary funds for the project to move forward.

On the other hand, using “providing that” in the same context could introduce ambiguity, as it may imply that the project is already guaranteed and the funds are merely supplemental. Example of usage with “Providing that”

Despite “provided that” being the more preferred phrase, “providing that” can still be used effectively in certain contexts.

Let’s look at an example in a business operation agreement:

“XYZ Corporation agrees to provide financing, providing that ABC Corporation demonstrates a positive cash flow for the past three years.” In this example, “providing that” is used to establish the condition that XYZ Corporation will only provide financing if ABC Corporation can demonstrate a positive cash flow over a specific period. Here, “providing that” implies that the financing is conditional upon meeting the specified requirement.

However, it’s important to note that in most cases, “provided that” would be the more appropriate and commonly used alternative.

Examples of Usage

Examples of “Provided that”

Let’s explore some common examples of the usage of “provided that”:

1. “The employees will have access to the company gym, provided that they sign a liability waiver.” In this case, the phrase ensures that employees can access the company gym only if they sign a liability waiver, thus protecting the company from potential legal claims.

2. “The contract allows for termination for convenience, provided that a written notice is given at least thirty days in advance.” Here, the phrase establishes the condition that termination for convenience is only possible if the party provides written notice within the specified timeframe, allowing both parties to plan accordingly.

Examples of “Providing that”

Let’s examine a few examples of the usage of “providing that”:

1. “The business operation agreement entitles the franchisees to use the company’s logo and trademarks, providing that they comply with the established brand guidelines.” In this instance, “providing that” establishes the condition that franchisees can use the company’s logo and trademarks only if they adhere to the brand guidelines, ensuring consistent representation of the company’s image.

2. “The loan agreement allows for financing of new equipment, providing that the borrower provides a detailed breakdown of the equipment costs and a repayment plan.” Here, “providing that” sets the condition that the borrower can access financing for new equipment only if they provide the lender with a comprehensive breakdown of costs and a repayment plan, ensuring transparency and accountability.

By examining these examples, it becomes evident how the usage of “provided that” and “providing that” can convey specific conditions and requirements, contributing to the precision and effectiveness of written communication. In conclusion, understanding the subtle nuances in the usage of “provided that” and “providing that” is crucial for effective communication, especially in legal writing.

While “provided that” remains the preferred and more precise choice in most cases, “providing that” can still be used effectively in certain contexts. By using these phrases correctly, you will be able to convey conditions, exceptions, and qualifications with clarity and ensure that your writing is both legally sound and easily understood.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Meaning of “Provided that”

Q: What does “provided that” mean? A: “Provided that” is a phrase that establishes a condition or exception.

It implies that something is true or will happen only if a specific condition is met. It can be synonymously understood as “on the condition that,” “with the exception that,” “if,” “only if,” or “as long as.”

Q: How can I use “provided that” in a sentence?

A: You can use “provided that” to set conditions, exceptions, or qualifications in a sentence. For example, “Emily will attend the party, provided that it doesn’t conflict with her work schedule.” Here, the phrase establishes the condition that Emily will attend the party if it does not conflict with her work schedule.

Usage of “Providing that”

Q: Can “providing that” be used interchangeably with “provided that”? A: While “providing that” and “provided that” have a similar meaning, they are not completely interchangeable.

“Provided that” is the more commonly used and preferred phrase in formal writing, especially in legal documents. On the other hand, “providing that” is less precise and can introduce ambiguity in certain contexts.

It is important to use “provided that” for conveying conditions, exceptions, and qualifications. Q: How can I use “providing that” in a sentence?

A: “Providing that” can be used to establish a condition in a sentence. For example, “We will proceed with the project, providing that the necessary resources are available.” Here, the phrase sets the condition that the project will proceed only if the required resources are available.

Comparison between “Providing that” and “Provided that”

Q: Are “providing that” and “provided that” equally valid in legal writing? A: “Provided that” is the more preferred phrase in legal writing due to its precision and clarity.

Critics argue that “providing that” can introduce ambiguity in certain contexts. Therefore, when it comes to legal writing, “provided that” is recommended for conveying conditions, exceptions, and qualifications.

Its usage ensures that the intended meaning is clear and leaves no room for misinterpretation. Q: Can “providing that” still be used effectively in specific contexts?

A: While “providing that” is less commonly used in legal writing, it can still be used effectively in certain contexts. However, it is important to ensure that its usage does not introduce any ambiguity or confusion.

Careful consideration should be given to the specific requirements of the writing context to determine which phrase, “provided that” or “providing that,” is the most appropriate and precise choice. Examples of usage with “Provided that”

Q: Can you provide some examples of “provided that” in legal writing?

A: Certainly! Here are a few examples:

1. “The contract is valid, provided that both parties sign it.” In this example, the phrase sets the condition that the contract will be considered valid only if both parties sign it.

2. “The lease agreement allows for early termination, provided that a written notice is given thirty days in advance.” Here, the phrase establishes the condition that early termination of the lease agreement is possible only if the party provides written notice within the specified timeframe.

Q: Can you give an example of “provided that” in relation to legal capacity? A: Of course! Consider the following example: “The individual can enter into a legally binding contract, provided that they have the legal capacity to do so.” In this instance, the phrase indicates that an individual can enter into a legally binding contract only if they possess the necessary legal capacity.

By understanding these examples, you can see how “provided that” adds clarity and specificity to legal writing, ensuring that conditions and exceptions are articulated effectively. In conclusion, the usage of “provided that” and “providing that” is common in legal writing to establish conditions, exceptions, and qualifications.

“Provided that” is the more preferred and precise phrase, while “providing that” is used less frequently. Understanding the differences between these phrases and their proper usage in specific contexts will enhance your ability to draft clear, effective, and legally sound documents.

By ensuring that your conditions and exceptions are clearly conveyed, you can avoid misunderstandings and promote better communication in legal writing. In conclusion, the meaning and usage of “provided that” in legal writing play a crucial role in establishing conditions, exceptions, and qualifications.

While “provided that” is the preferred phrase due to its precision and clarity, “providing that” can still be used effectively in certain contexts. It is important to consider the specific requirements of the writing context to determine the most appropriate and precise choice.

By understanding and utilizing these phrases correctly, writers can enhance their ability to convey conditions and exceptions clearly, ensuring effective communication in legal documents. Remember, the proper use of “provided that” is essential to minimize misunderstandings and promote a sound legal understanding.

So, next time you encounter these phrases in legal writing, pay attention to their nuances and use them strategically to convey your intended meaning accurately.

Popular Posts